TYM: MAJOR REVISION

I’m a bit surprised by the verdict. If I were the editor, I would reject the paper.

"The paper is strong on the relevance dimension. It was interesting to read, and I am sure there will be many readers who will be interested to read this paper. Moreover, it is written very well, and on many occasions the authors have done a good job of describing the key concepts in words. Those working in freight optimization would likely find this paper timely and useful."

Advertisements
TYM: MAJOR REVISION

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s